Comments on: A shining example of how liberals debate: by calling their opponent a “dumb bitch”

By: Right is RIght

Right is RIght — Mon, 18 May 2009 04:26:58 +0000

Cassy is fat. “Smoking Fat Commentary.”

By: MBSS

MBSS — Mon, 18 May 2009 04:26:02 +0000

you all are dumb bitches.

gwb war criminal. GOP is dead. haha

By: publius

publius — Tue, 12 May 2009 12:32:06 +0000

well she may not be a bitch but she ain’t the shiniest hubcap on the lot

By: Aunty Josie

Aunty Josie — Tue, 05 May 2009 15:10:02 +0000

This link shows her with no make-up or hairspray.
She looks better with out the fake look that outdated pageant would have made her wear.

http://perezhilton.com/2009-05-05-what-would-jesus-say-about-this

I think she is STUNNING!

By: Julia

Julia — Wed, 29 Apr 2009 06:20:08 +0000

What a stupid and ignorant jerk he is. And he was the judge? The true judge doesn’t blaspheme people, only low class gays like him do. His place is to wash floors… that’s where he should be. He has no intelligence, no aristocratic nature and no brains whatsoever. His answer sucks even more than Miss California’s. What a pitiful and pathetic man he is… jesus…. shame, shame, shame!!!

By: Bobv

Bobv — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:48:35 +0000

Next miss USA pageant, ask their opinion on the Heller ruling. Any who disagree with it should be immediately removed from further consideration. I mean, this is the miss *USA* pageant, any who disagree with the 2nd amendment can’t represent America.

I wonder if anyone would have a problem with that.

By: Tel-Chai Nation

Tel-Chai Nation — Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:45:45 +0000

Politicized beauty pageant…

The crappy AP covers the recent Miss USA pageant, and it seems like they can’t keep themselves from focusing on the political slant that shouldn’t have been allowed or addressed following the winner’s crowning. When Miss California was being intervi…

By: Justin

Justin — Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:26:56 +0000

Ooh, I’m sorry Miss California, the correct answer was stricter gun control. Stricter gun control. Better luck next time.

By: CaptDMO

CaptDMO — Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:40:28 +0000

I have to opine that “liberal” is an inappropriate label for for
the (what does he actually do for a career?) Mr. Hilton, while agreeing with the premise that MOST liberal/Democrat debate tends to be based on false “emotional” premise, and challenges to their theses tend to be met with “Well,…my critic is a big poopy face!”

I’ll happily consider the public tantrum a desperate cry for attention, and that the drama queen’s sagging score of “times name
mentioned by “popular” failure to launch affecianados has
emboldened traditional non-sequitur ally-seeking rant so popular amongst sophist, yetself proclaimed, “progressive” folks desperately scratching for a bone amongst the dumpsters of “entertainment” folk with actual talent.

I also have to question the thinking that allowed the gossip columnist a seat in the front row, or the bona fides
that were deemed suitable for such a social parasite (again, this “blogger” does WHAT for “a living”?)to be
bestowed another unmerited notch on their “resume”.

By: Mark

Mark — Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:31:43 +0000

Why exactly was an openly gay male judging a beauty pageant? I mean, they absolutely despise women, the ones they try to emulate. In my opinion it was an ambush.