<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does a woman need to be the beta in a relationship in order to be happy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cassyfiano.com/2009/01/does-a-woman-need-to-be-the-beta-in-a-relationship-in-order-to-be-happy/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cassyfiano.com/2009/01/does-a-woman-need-to-be-the-beta-in-a-relationship-in-order-to-be-happy</link>
	<description>Smokin' Hot Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 20:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.cassyfiano.com/2009/01/does-a-woman-need-to-be-the-beta-in-a-relationship-in-order-to-be-happy/comment-page-1#comment-7298</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cassyfiano.com/?p=1936#comment-7298</guid>
		<description>Andrew:

I&#039;m not satisfied with just being patient. Besides, why would I want some reformed broad who&#039;d marry me just to satisfy a ticking biological clock?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew:</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not satisfied with just being patient. Besides, why would I want some reformed broad who&#8217;d marry me just to satisfy a ticking biological clock?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harry flashman</title>
		<link>http://www.cassyfiano.com/2009/01/does-a-woman-need-to-be-the-beta-in-a-relationship-in-order-to-be-happy/comment-page-1#comment-7202</link>
		<dc:creator>harry flashman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cassyfiano.com/?p=1936#comment-7202</guid>
		<description>Whoa! Larry! Dood! Way to take a stand! You get that &#039;tood from a Kerry-Edwards motivational DVD on Alpha male decisivness? From the &quot;Metrosexual Guide to Algore Manly Men?&quot; You ARE &quot;The Decider&quot; - hands down. ROTFLMAO!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa! Larry! Dood! Way to take a stand! You get that &#8216;tood from a Kerry-Edwards motivational DVD on Alpha male decisivness? From the &#8220;Metrosexual Guide to Algore Manly Men?&#8221; You ARE &#8220;The Decider&#8221; &#8211; hands down. ROTFLMAO!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Sheldon</title>
		<link>http://www.cassyfiano.com/2009/01/does-a-woman-need-to-be-the-beta-in-a-relationship-in-order-to-be-happy/comment-page-1#comment-7201</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Sheldon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cassyfiano.com/?p=1936#comment-7201</guid>
		<description>BoyHowdy--want a discussion shutdown?  Let ol&#039; Larry comment.

Quicker than a Godwin event.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BoyHowdy&#8211;want a discussion shutdown?  Let ol&#8217; Larry comment.</p>
<p>Quicker than a Godwin event.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Sheldon</title>
		<link>http://www.cassyfiano.com/2009/01/does-a-woman-need-to-be-the-beta-in-a-relationship-in-order-to-be-happy/comment-page-1#comment-7123</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Sheldon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cassyfiano.com/?p=1936#comment-7123</guid>
		<description>The discussion begins with a framework that does not actually exist.

People are very complex things.  Living is a very complicated matter.

Two people living together is kindasorta the product (math sense--one times the other) of those two factors, squared or cubed.

In some things and at some times and in some places, one will provide the leadership (a term I like better that the &quot;alpha-beta&quot; business which means the same thing but which has baggage attached).  When the the thing, the time, or the place changes, so might the leadership change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The discussion begins with a framework that does not actually exist.</p>
<p>People are very complex things.  Living is a very complicated matter.</p>
<p>Two people living together is kindasorta the product (math sense&#8211;one times the other) of those two factors, squared or cubed.</p>
<p>In some things and at some times and in some places, one will provide the leadership (a term I like better that the &#8220;alpha-beta&#8221; business which means the same thing but which has baggage attached).  When the the thing, the time, or the place changes, so might the leadership change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: physics geek</title>
		<link>http://www.cassyfiano.com/2009/01/does-a-woman-need-to-be-the-beta-in-a-relationship-in-order-to-be-happy/comment-page-1#comment-7078</link>
		<dc:creator>physics geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 02:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cassyfiano.com/?p=1936#comment-7078</guid>
		<description>Interesting discussion. Since I assume that you and Mr. Hawkins were discussing strength of personality as opposed to physical strength, I will mostly second John&#039;s point. Not that women need to be beta, of course. My previous girlfriends and now my wife would in no way be considered beta female. All are strong willed and capable. In my opinion, that sort of woman would not be happy with a beta male. Oh sure, there are cases where it works; nothing is universal. However, an alpha woman partnered to a beta male will probably end up despising his weakness over time. Whether or not those feelings are conscious, or even expressed, is irrelevant.

My son, a few months ago, asked at the dinner table this question: &quot;Daddy, how did mommy get to be the boss?&quot; After I stopped laughing, I echoed Bill Cosby&#039;s comment: &quot;I&#039;ve seen the boss&#039; job. I don&#039;t WANT it!&quot; Since my wife stays at home with the children, I usually defer to her in day to day decisions; she&#039;s the closest to them and always makes a good call. However, we always-always- discuss and agree on the big issues. Most of the time, when we disagree, I&#039;m willing to compromise. There are a few issues on which I will not. My wife recognizes those issues and does not press me on them. Ever. 

I would say that I&#039;m the alpha while my wife is an alpha-minus. She&#039;s definitely not a beta, but I cannot truthfully call her an straight up alpha. Call it the Big Fat Greek marriage: I&#039;m the head of the family, while my wife is the neck. I can beat a stiff neck, but most of the time it&#039;s okay to relieve the stress and turn in the direction that the neck wants you to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting discussion. Since I assume that you and Mr. Hawkins were discussing strength of personality as opposed to physical strength, I will mostly second John&#8217;s point. Not that women need to be beta, of course. My previous girlfriends and now my wife would in no way be considered beta female. All are strong willed and capable. In my opinion, that sort of woman would not be happy with a beta male. Oh sure, there are cases where it works; nothing is universal. However, an alpha woman partnered to a beta male will probably end up despising his weakness over time. Whether or not those feelings are conscious, or even expressed, is irrelevant.</p>
<p>My son, a few months ago, asked at the dinner table this question: &#8220;Daddy, how did mommy get to be the boss?&#8221; After I stopped laughing, I echoed Bill Cosby&#8217;s comment: &#8220;I&#8217;ve seen the boss&#8217; job. I don&#8217;t WANT it!&#8221; Since my wife stays at home with the children, I usually defer to her in day to day decisions; she&#8217;s the closest to them and always makes a good call. However, we always-always- discuss and agree on the big issues. Most of the time, when we disagree, I&#8217;m willing to compromise. There are a few issues on which I will not. My wife recognizes those issues and does not press me on them. Ever. </p>
<p>I would say that I&#8217;m the alpha while my wife is an alpha-minus. She&#8217;s definitely not a beta, but I cannot truthfully call her an straight up alpha. Call it the Big Fat Greek marriage: I&#8217;m the head of the family, while my wife is the neck. I can beat a stiff neck, but most of the time it&#8217;s okay to relieve the stress and turn in the direction that the neck wants you to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.cassyfiano.com/2009/01/does-a-woman-need-to-be-the-beta-in-a-relationship-in-order-to-be-happy/comment-page-1#comment-6968</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 15:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cassyfiano.com/?p=1936#comment-6968</guid>
		<description>Too all decent men at there.  Don&#039;t get upset about how women &quot;go for the jerks.&quot;  Most women who do that are just immature and not worth dating anyway.  The truth is that even though men are always accused of being the one&#039;s scared of responsibility and commitment, women are just as bad in today&#039;s society.  The popularity of &quot;Sex and the City&quot; and its like hasn&#039;t helped. (I&#039;m not saying its wrong to watch Sex and the City, I&#039;m just saying too many women look at its characters as role models.)

I was always the guy who was accused of being the &quot;nice guy who finished last&quot;. I always wondered why? Too often the nice guys are accused of being unmanly but I was never that. I&#039;ve played semi-pro football, can bench press over 400 lbs, and am more than willing to kick the ass of the &quot;jerk&quot; who mistreats women. The truth is that many women get scared off by men who want marriage and kids, but they will eventually mature. Be patient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too all decent men at there.  Don&#8217;t get upset about how women &#8220;go for the jerks.&#8221;  Most women who do that are just immature and not worth dating anyway.  The truth is that even though men are always accused of being the one&#8217;s scared of responsibility and commitment, women are just as bad in today&#8217;s society.  The popularity of &#8220;Sex and the City&#8221; and its like hasn&#8217;t helped. (I&#8217;m not saying its wrong to watch Sex and the City, I&#8217;m just saying too many women look at its characters as role models.)</p>
<p>I was always the guy who was accused of being the &#8220;nice guy who finished last&#8221;. I always wondered why? Too often the nice guys are accused of being unmanly but I was never that. I&#8217;ve played semi-pro football, can bench press over 400 lbs, and am more than willing to kick the ass of the &#8220;jerk&#8221; who mistreats women. The truth is that many women get scared off by men who want marriage and kids, but they will eventually mature. Be patient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan</title>
		<link>http://www.cassyfiano.com/2009/01/does-a-woman-need-to-be-the-beta-in-a-relationship-in-order-to-be-happy/comment-page-1#comment-6933</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 08:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cassyfiano.com/?p=1936#comment-6933</guid>
		<description>Looked at from a Christian perspective, there&#039;s another aspect to the issue. A lot of needless confusion regarding alpha/beta, who&#039;s the &quot;leader&quot;, etc., can be avoided if the man and woman follow Paul&#039;s directive in Ephesians 5:21-25. Too many people focus on the word &quot;submit&quot; from a dom/sub, power struggle perspective, missing out on the bigger truth. It&#039;s not an issue of power but, as some posters have noted, leadership and love. Interestingly, to me at least, the command of the wife to submit to the husband&#039;s leadership is not nearly as difficult to follow as the the next: for husbands to love their wives as Christ loved the church. The latter means acting in the other&#039;s best interest rather than your own. This is truly sacrificial love and cannot by definition be dominating. It requires a man of real strength and leads circularly back to the opening line (Eph 5:21 - &quot;Submit to each other&quot;, far too often ignored) because all-out sacrificial love yields the husband&#039;s desires to the wife&#039;s.

It&#039;s not easy, but couples who work at this kind of relationship can count on a marriage lasting decades rather than years. And it only gets better with time and effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looked at from a Christian perspective, there&#8217;s another aspect to the issue. A lot of needless confusion regarding alpha/beta, who&#8217;s the &#8220;leader&#8221;, etc., can be avoided if the man and woman follow Paul&#8217;s directive in Ephesians 5:21-25. Too many people focus on the word &#8220;submit&#8221; from a dom/sub, power struggle perspective, missing out on the bigger truth. It&#8217;s not an issue of power but, as some posters have noted, leadership and love. Interestingly, to me at least, the command of the wife to submit to the husband&#8217;s leadership is not nearly as difficult to follow as the the next: for husbands to love their wives as Christ loved the church. The latter means acting in the other&#8217;s best interest rather than your own. This is truly sacrificial love and cannot by definition be dominating. It requires a man of real strength and leads circularly back to the opening line (Eph 5:21 &#8211; &#8220;Submit to each other&#8221;, far too often ignored) because all-out sacrificial love yields the husband&#8217;s desires to the wife&#8217;s.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not easy, but couples who work at this kind of relationship can count on a marriage lasting decades rather than years. And it only gets better with time and effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.cassyfiano.com/2009/01/does-a-woman-need-to-be-the-beta-in-a-relationship-in-order-to-be-happy/comment-page-1#comment-6906</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cassyfiano.com/?p=1936#comment-6906</guid>
		<description>The oft-repeated adage &quot;All the good ones go for jerks&quot; (when talking about women) is not only silly but outright false and is a dictum of lesser men. Let me tell you why:

First, if the woman in question goes for jerks, why is she a good one?

Second, the probable reason why she does go for jerks is that she is likely miserable on the inside. Maybe she had a traumatic childhood, maybe she&#039;s immature, maybe she needs therapy, etc. To her, a jerk represents what she wants to be: confident, secure, grown-up. One problem: a jerk isn&#039;t any of these things. That&#039;s just what she is attracted to because of warped perceptual skills. 

Third, going on a generalized principle of &quot;by the people they choose to be around shall you know them&quot;, why in the world would a self-respecting, mature adult male want anything to do with this woman?

And fourth, chances are that this woman is suffering from a psychological condition known as &#039;codependency&#039;, in which the codependent views themselves as utterly worthless, undeserving of respect, love, or even toleration of their presence. Guess what a woman suffering from this chooses to pick out in terms of love affairs? Jerks, or worse, abusers. 

That being said, relating the above to this post, I think John Hawkins is missing the point. It isn&#039;t about &#039;alpha&#039; and &#039;beta&#039;; it&#039;s about choosing a woman you respect and who respects you back. &#039;Alpha&#039; and &#039;beta&#039; to me speak more about differentiating roles rather than saying anything profound about the nature of men and women.

So I agree with Cassy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The oft-repeated adage &#8220;All the good ones go for jerks&#8221; (when talking about women) is not only silly but outright false and is a dictum of lesser men. Let me tell you why:</p>
<p>First, if the woman in question goes for jerks, why is she a good one?</p>
<p>Second, the probable reason why she does go for jerks is that she is likely miserable on the inside. Maybe she had a traumatic childhood, maybe she&#8217;s immature, maybe she needs therapy, etc. To her, a jerk represents what she wants to be: confident, secure, grown-up. One problem: a jerk isn&#8217;t any of these things. That&#8217;s just what she is attracted to because of warped perceptual skills. </p>
<p>Third, going on a generalized principle of &#8220;by the people they choose to be around shall you know them&#8221;, why in the world would a self-respecting, mature adult male want anything to do with this woman?</p>
<p>And fourth, chances are that this woman is suffering from a psychological condition known as &#8216;codependency&#8217;, in which the codependent views themselves as utterly worthless, undeserving of respect, love, or even toleration of their presence. Guess what a woman suffering from this chooses to pick out in terms of love affairs? Jerks, or worse, abusers. </p>
<p>That being said, relating the above to this post, I think John Hawkins is missing the point. It isn&#8217;t about &#8216;alpha&#8217; and &#8216;beta&#8217;; it&#8217;s about choosing a woman you respect and who respects you back. &#8216;Alpha&#8217; and &#8216;beta&#8217; to me speak more about differentiating roles rather than saying anything profound about the nature of men and women.</p>
<p>So I agree with Cassy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.cassyfiano.com/2009/01/does-a-woman-need-to-be-the-beta-in-a-relationship-in-order-to-be-happy/comment-page-1#comment-6900</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cassyfiano.com/?p=1936#comment-6900</guid>
		<description>Power in relationships has always been an integral, and largely overlooked/avoided, component of relationship success.  

Successful couples have always handled it in ways that worked best for them, but generally is not talked about.

It seems to me that the more clear we can be on how the authority to decide and to act in various various areas of life together, the better we do.

Alpha/beta? Generalities probably aren&#039;t the most helpful way for a specific couple to deal with power issues. Who&#039;s best at what? Who knows the most about what?  Who enjoys dealing with what?  What balance feels best? works best for the two of you?  At the end of the day, that&#039;s what gets the jobs done what holds couples together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Power in relationships has always been an integral, and largely overlooked/avoided, component of relationship success.  </p>
<p>Successful couples have always handled it in ways that worked best for them, but generally is not talked about.</p>
<p>It seems to me that the more clear we can be on how the authority to decide and to act in various various areas of life together, the better we do.</p>
<p>Alpha/beta? Generalities probably aren&#8217;t the most helpful way for a specific couple to deal with power issues. Who&#8217;s best at what? Who knows the most about what?  Who enjoys dealing with what?  What balance feels best? works best for the two of you?  At the end of the day, that&#8217;s what gets the jobs done what holds couples together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.cassyfiano.com/2009/01/does-a-woman-need-to-be-the-beta-in-a-relationship-in-order-to-be-happy/comment-page-1#comment-6898</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cassyfiano.com/?p=1936#comment-6898</guid>
		<description>Perhaps Tennyson said it best:

“Man for the field and woman for the hearth:
Man for the sword and for the needle she:
Man with the head and woman with the heart:
Man to command and woman to obey:
All else confusion.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps Tennyson said it best:</p>
<p>“Man for the field and woman for the hearth:<br />
Man for the sword and for the needle she:<br />
Man with the head and woman with the heart:<br />
Man to command and woman to obey:<br />
All else confusion.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

