<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sarah Palin IS sexy.  And there&#8217;s nothing wrong with that.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cassyfiano.com/2008/09/sarah-palin-is-sexy-and-theres-nothing-wrong-with-that/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cassyfiano.com/2008/09/sarah-palin-is-sexy-and-theres-nothing-wrong-with-that</link>
	<description>Smokin' Hot Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 20:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.cassyfiano.com/2008/09/sarah-palin-is-sexy-and-theres-nothing-wrong-with-that/comment-page-1#comment-4257</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 00:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cassyfiano.com/?p=1139#comment-4257</guid>
		<description>Suddenly the women in the Democrat party are starting to realize that their foundational philosophical belief, that women should be able to do anything that men can do -- emphasis on the &quot;should be able&quot; -- requires the assumption that women *cannot* do anything that men can do.  They *need* women to be oppressed, or they don&#039;t make any sense.  Poor Hillary found that out the hard way.  If only Senator Clinton had stuck to what Cintra Wilson wrote above, &quot;support for women on women’s issues&quot;, instead of talking about economics and war and things.  Maybe if Hillary had spent more time dedicating children&#039;s hospitals and meeting with breast cancer survivors, her party would have nominated her.

Sarah boggles them because she acts as if nobody ever told her she wasn&#039;t allowed to be beautiful, have a big family, love who she is, and be the Governor of a state all at the same time.  So she just goes out and does it, oblivious to the &quot;rules&quot; that the Democratic Party needs enforced for its very survival.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suddenly the women in the Democrat party are starting to realize that their foundational philosophical belief, that women should be able to do anything that men can do &#8212; emphasis on the &#8220;should be able&#8221; &#8212; requires the assumption that women *cannot* do anything that men can do.  They *need* women to be oppressed, or they don&#8217;t make any sense.  Poor Hillary found that out the hard way.  If only Senator Clinton had stuck to what Cintra Wilson wrote above, &#8220;support for women on women’s issues&#8221;, instead of talking about economics and war and things.  Maybe if Hillary had spent more time dedicating children&#8217;s hospitals and meeting with breast cancer survivors, her party would have nominated her.</p>
<p>Sarah boggles them because she acts as if nobody ever told her she wasn&#8217;t allowed to be beautiful, have a big family, love who she is, and be the Governor of a state all at the same time.  So she just goes out and does it, oblivious to the &#8220;rules&#8221; that the Democratic Party needs enforced for its very survival.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Modgi</title>
		<link>http://www.cassyfiano.com/2008/09/sarah-palin-is-sexy-and-theres-nothing-wrong-with-that/comment-page-1#comment-4194</link>
		<dc:creator>Modgi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 22:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cassyfiano.com/?p=1139#comment-4194</guid>
		<description>&quot;even I drool over Sarah Palin&quot;

I&#039;ll be in my bunk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;even I drool over Sarah Palin&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be in my bunk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I R A Darth Aggie</title>
		<link>http://www.cassyfiano.com/2008/09/sarah-palin-is-sexy-and-theres-nothing-wrong-with-that/comment-page-1#comment-4174</link>
		<dc:creator>I R A Darth Aggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cassyfiano.com/?p=1139#comment-4174</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The rest of us women need to just shut up...&lt;/i&gt;

Sorry, that line just begged for a little Dowdification...

&lt;i&gt;even I drool over Sarah Palin&lt;/i&gt;

Now, now, don&#039;t go all &lt;i&gt;thespian&lt;/i&gt; on us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The rest of us women need to just shut up&#8230;</i></p>
<p>Sorry, that line just begged for a little Dowdification&#8230;</p>
<p><i>even I drool over Sarah Palin</i></p>
<p>Now, now, don&#8217;t go all <i>thespian</i> on us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: docjim505</title>
		<link>http://www.cassyfiano.com/2008/09/sarah-palin-is-sexy-and-theres-nothing-wrong-with-that/comment-page-1#comment-4150</link>
		<dc:creator>docjim505</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 10:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cassyfiano.com/?p=1139#comment-4150</guid>
		<description>Let me start with a self-evident truth: Rush is right! ;-)

He says that feminism exists to give unattractive women social acceptability, or something like that.  The women who tear down Sarah Palin for being attractive... What sort of women are they?  Ugly, grumpy, bitter b****es is my guess.  Either because they are so hideous that no decent man would even think about asking them out or because they&#039;ve somehow managed to convince themselves that being attractive to men is just WRONG, they are insanely jealous of an attractive woman who is comfortable in her own skin.

But here&#039;s the thing: Michelle Obama is an attractive woman.  Why does she get a pass - nay, fawning adulation - while Sarah Palin is derided as a bimbo, a sell-out, and even a whore?

I think the (R) behind her name has something to do with it.

It&#039;s not PDS.  It&#039;s CDS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me start with a self-evident truth: Rush is right! <img src='http://www.cassyfiano.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>He says that feminism exists to give unattractive women social acceptability, or something like that.  The women who tear down Sarah Palin for being attractive&#8230; What sort of women are they?  Ugly, grumpy, bitter b****es is my guess.  Either because they are so hideous that no decent man would even think about asking them out or because they&#8217;ve somehow managed to convince themselves that being attractive to men is just WRONG, they are insanely jealous of an attractive woman who is comfortable in her own skin.</p>
<p>But here&#8217;s the thing: Michelle Obama is an attractive woman.  Why does she get a pass &#8211; nay, fawning adulation &#8211; while Sarah Palin is derided as a bimbo, a sell-out, and even a whore?</p>
<p>I think the (R) behind her name has something to do with it.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not PDS.  It&#8217;s CDS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Expatriate Owl</title>
		<link>http://www.cassyfiano.com/2008/09/sarah-palin-is-sexy-and-theres-nothing-wrong-with-that/comment-page-1#comment-4143</link>
		<dc:creator>Expatriate Owl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 04:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cassyfiano.com/?p=1139#comment-4143</guid>
		<description>[From one of the 10 September postings on my blog:]

Am I the only one who has this impression? It seems that ever since Sarah Palin was chosen by John McCain to be his running mate, the women on the street seem to be more into wearing skirts and/or pantyhose. While Hillary Rodham Clinton and Michelle Obama were the leading ladies in the news media, it seemed that more women followed Hillary&#039;s cue and wore pantsuits, and Michelle&#039;s point blank statement that she abhors wearing pantyhose.

Now, I seem to see more skirts and pantyhose on women. Including the college campus where I teach (and college campuses are among the last place one would expect to find an increase in skirts or pantyhose these days).

Is it just the cooling weather? [Not likely.]. The seasonal shift of the calendar to September? Or is Sarah Palin actually exerting a subconscious influence upon so many women in America?

My family hasn&#039;t been in the apparel business since my grandfather retired from Gimbels in the early 1970&#039;s (he went there after trying his hand in a failed clothing store and a bankrupt garment manufacturing shop). Does anyone out there have any data on the latest women&#039;s apparel sales trends for the past few weeks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[From one of the 10 September postings on my blog:]</p>
<p>Am I the only one who has this impression? It seems that ever since Sarah Palin was chosen by John McCain to be his running mate, the women on the street seem to be more into wearing skirts and/or pantyhose. While Hillary Rodham Clinton and Michelle Obama were the leading ladies in the news media, it seemed that more women followed Hillary&#8217;s cue and wore pantsuits, and Michelle&#8217;s point blank statement that she abhors wearing pantyhose.</p>
<p>Now, I seem to see more skirts and pantyhose on women. Including the college campus where I teach (and college campuses are among the last place one would expect to find an increase in skirts or pantyhose these days).</p>
<p>Is it just the cooling weather? [Not likely.]. The seasonal shift of the calendar to September? Or is Sarah Palin actually exerting a subconscious influence upon so many women in America?</p>
<p>My family hasn&#8217;t been in the apparel business since my grandfather retired from Gimbels in the early 1970&#8242;s (he went there after trying his hand in a failed clothing store and a bankrupt garment manufacturing shop). Does anyone out there have any data on the latest women&#8217;s apparel sales trends for the past few weeks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.cassyfiano.com/2008/09/sarah-palin-is-sexy-and-theres-nothing-wrong-with-that/comment-page-1#comment-4142</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 03:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cassyfiano.com/?p=1139#comment-4142</guid>
		<description>Right on Cassy about men not being the enemy. We can take it a step further and say conservative men are not the enemy. In fact, conservative men generally there to protect and defend women a lot more than liberals. I noticed in almost every rant against Sarah, the feminazis, are quick to take a shot at conservative men especially Evangelical Christians.

But they never give a reason why those men are so bad. What is wrong about a man who wants to commit himself to one women, love her, and raise a family with her. It sure beats the guy who uses women, sleeps around, and thanks whatever the hell he believes in for Roe vs. Wade in case of an &quot;accident&quot;. Which is what most liberal guys are. 

In fact, I think most men who consider themselves &quot;allies of feminism&quot; (who aren&#039;t gay, of course) are usually just sexual predators who are looking for good odds even if the quailty of the women is awful. Its like how Chris Rock once made the joke to go to abortion rallies top pick up women, because you know they&#039;re putting out&quot; (clean term for what he actually used. And these feminazis think they are the good men while conservatives are evil. Its completely bass ackwards.

2008 will go down in history as the election the liberal media gave to the Republicans because Americans are smart enough to see through thier horribles smears and sterotypes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on Cassy about men not being the enemy. We can take it a step further and say conservative men are not the enemy. In fact, conservative men generally there to protect and defend women a lot more than liberals. I noticed in almost every rant against Sarah, the feminazis, are quick to take a shot at conservative men especially Evangelical Christians.</p>
<p>But they never give a reason why those men are so bad. What is wrong about a man who wants to commit himself to one women, love her, and raise a family with her. It sure beats the guy who uses women, sleeps around, and thanks whatever the hell he believes in for Roe vs. Wade in case of an &#8220;accident&#8221;. Which is what most liberal guys are. </p>
<p>In fact, I think most men who consider themselves &#8220;allies of feminism&#8221; (who aren&#8217;t gay, of course) are usually just sexual predators who are looking for good odds even if the quailty of the women is awful. Its like how Chris Rock once made the joke to go to abortion rallies top pick up women, because you know they&#8217;re putting out&#8221; (clean term for what he actually used. And these feminazis think they are the good men while conservatives are evil. Its completely bass ackwards.</p>
<p>2008 will go down in history as the election the liberal media gave to the Republicans because Americans are smart enough to see through thier horribles smears and sterotypes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

