Far right? I prefer the term, “normal”.

I would love to believe that overturning Roe v Wade would lead to an overwhelming surge of personal responsibility. Crack heads would stop doing crack to take care of their children they make. Welfare families would welcome additional children and continue to struggle to get off of welfare. Weak willed parents would stop taking their frustrations out on their kids. Etc.

Whether Roe v Wade is overturned or not, there will still crack babies, abused toddlers, prostituted teens and welfare moms popping out babies. Am I right to assume that you would deem this group better off aborted?

Personally, I feel every child should have the chance to experience life. No matter how sick, small or how many cards are stacked against them.

Now you are suggesting that “we” must get involved to support them. Been there, done that. I will spare you the details but I have done that. I also continue to do my share of helping those in the group you listed. But to have the government legislate would add to continuing list of failures by “Big Government”.

So what are you doing to help the downtrodden raise their children?

IF Roe vs Wade were overturned, if you got ALL that you wanted when it comes to legislating social morality, if it became illegal to have an abortion at ANY time after conception…

How would you support the unwanted babies, including the crack head babies, the abused toddlers, the prostituted teens and the welfare moms producing more unwanted, primarily dark-skinned, hard-to-adopt babies?

Please. It’s hard to find more legitimate websites where conservatives are commenting (point me to some, please, if you know of them–I truly would like to hear the answers to this question). I hope some of you will indulge me by answering seriously.

Cassy, you prepared for the tropical storm? Sticking around or leaving? I plan on riding it out, since Frances and Jeanne appear to have been worse than Faye is forecasted. Either way, good luck and take care!

Well…it says it all, really.