Comments on: Shocker: NOW comes out against Sarah Palin

By: Jose Renato

Jose Renato — Sat, 20 Sep 2008 16:26:32 +0000

All I can say to these women who are against Sarah Palin and denegrading her as a soccer mom or anything else, they must be in love with this clown Obama. All I can say to them is,thank goodness you can’t get pregnant through your throat.

By: Richard

Richard — Wed, 10 Sep 2008 21:38:31 +0000

The thing that gets me about the feminists and these radicals, they are never happy. They won’t be happy until one of THEIR radicals is in office, or at least running for it. And as for Pro-life or Pro-choice, thats a personal matter… How many of these feminists are good looking enough to get pregnant anyway? Let alone consider having an abortion.

By: Ironwolf32

Ironwolf32 — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:15:20 +0000

Some dimwit called into a radio show I was listening to in passing this weekend who claimed to be a “Republican who voted for Bush for the past 2 elections”. He was a fraud because this person had a problem with Sarah Palin choosing to go ahead with having her down syndrome child instead aborting. He actually had a problem with her having the child. Unreal.

I see NOW in the same light as the dimwit. I guess women can lose right of free speech, right to bear arms and right to vote but, don’t take away their abortion rights…

Sarah Palin is the perfect example of a modern day woman and the left is furious that she is a conservative.

By: Even More Link-Love for our Beloved VP Nominee at Haemet

Even More Link-Love for our Beloved VP Nominee at Haemet — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 03:22:01 +0000

[...] and feminists respond to the sexism and the amniotic fluid issue (which is clearly an issue of national importance). Yes, folks, the [...]

By: Steve L.

Steve L. — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 13:25:23 +0000

NOW against Palin? That is surely the strongest, positive endorsement she could ever get.

By: metro1

metro1 — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 07:32:16 +0000

Wow: Sarah Palin is about to become a grandma – but she’s still a bad ass

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yn7UzxXv8p4

By: Rob Farrington

Rob Farrington — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:48:43 +0000

Oh, but won’t someone please think of the chiiildrennn?!??

Oh crap, she DOES. And so do the rest of the evil, imperialistic neocons, too.

Excuse me; I think that as a Progressive, I just used a popular slogan at a totally inappropriate time, and in the totally wrong place, too. Sorry…I meant to come to an anti-gun and anti-killing-polar-bears-with-chemtrails site, but the Jewish Lobby took control of my PC and redirected me. The Zionist bastards.

*Sidles towards the side exits, murmuring “sorry…oh wait, was that your toe…oops, sorry…please let me out before noticing that I’m a hypocrite. Sorry! Erm…yes, we can?!?”*

OK, sarcasm off, now. If I was American yet (there’s apparently this red tape thing where I have to get a green card and then become naturalized), I’d gladly have her speak for me. Not because she’s female, but because she’s a decent human being who I respect. My American fiance feels the same way.

By: docjim505

docjim505 — Mon, 01 Sep 2008 21:32:44 +0000

Anybody really surprised? Palin is an accomplished and independent woman, but since she has an (R) after her name the NAG’s won’t support her. It’s part ‘n’ parcel of the Congressional Black Caucus not allowing J.C. Watts in their little club, the REAL name of which was the Congressional Black LIBERAL DEMOCRAT Caucus.

But here’s the thing: the MSM looooves the NAG’s. As far as they are concerned, the NAG’s speak for American women (other than the ones who enslave themselves in (gag) MARRIAGE). So, if the NAG’s come out and say that Sarah Palin won’t “represent women”, then that’s the official view of ALL American women (except those who prostitute themselves by marrying a (spit) MAN). Don’t hold your breath waiting for the MSM to interview women who are proud of Sarah Palin both for what she’s accomplished as a politician AND as a wife and mother. About all we’ll see is crabby dikes who can’t stand it that Palin seems to love her husband and children even while pursuing her political career and doesn’t look at children as a burden.*

——

(*) Full disclosure: I look at children as a burden (they are rats that make a lot of noise), but I don’t kid myself that I’m somehow “progressive” or “forward thinking” or “liberated”. I’m simply a crabby, bitter, selfish man.

By: ken in anchorage

ken in anchorage — Mon, 01 Sep 2008 18:22:42 +0000

If they were truly pro-choice, wouldn’t choosing to keep your child also be speaking “FOR” women?

By: btenney

btenney — Mon, 01 Sep 2008 17:17:28 +0000

She apparently has a deleterious effect on Hurricanes and Blowhards.